Tag Archives: SFAR

Top Agent Network amends suit to focus on NAR as ‘real wrongdoer’

By | | Uncategorized
Comments Off on Top Agent Network amends suit to focus on NAR as ‘real wrongdoer’

TAN CEO: “NAR is the architect and promoter of the disastrous Clear Cooperation Policy and is the only party with the power to rescind it” Continue reading →

Members of SFAR have a new AI productivity Sidekick

By | | Uncategorized
Comments Off on Members of SFAR have a new AI productivity Sidekick

Sidekick was developed by San Francisco-based boutique brokerage Avenue 8. It primarily uses a text interface to send commands to retrieve data, execute tasks and in many ways, function as a common, “visual” interface would. It’s now offered to members… Continue reading →

DOJ will weigh in at appeals court during NAR pocket listing dispute

By | | Uncategorized
Comments Off on DOJ will weigh in at appeals court during NAR pocket listing dispute

The antitrust enforcer will get 5 minutes at oral arguments in Top Agent Network’s appeal to overturn a lower court ruling tossing its case against NAR’s Clear Cooperation Policy. Continue reading →

Top Agent Network appeals dismissal of NAR antitrust suit

By | | Uncategorized
Comments Off on Top Agent Network appeals dismissal of NAR antitrust suit

Lower court suggested TAN was the wrong plaintiff to bring suit because its business model is itself allegedly anticompetitive, but TAN says the court’s order was “erroneous.” Continue reading →

Court calls Top Agent Network ‘anticompetitive,’ tosses NAR suit

By | | Uncategorized
Comments Off on Court calls Top Agent Network ‘anticompetitive,’ tosses NAR suit

Judge voiced concerns that the Clear Cooperation Policy could have anticompetitive effects, but suggested TAN was the wrong plaintiff to bring suit. Continue reading →

Top Agent Network takes aim at office exclusives in NAR pocket listing policy

By | | Uncategorized
Comments Off on Top Agent Network takes aim at office exclusives in NAR pocket listing policy

Top Agent Network argues that office exclusives result in less inventory, less exposure for listings and less consumer choice while benefitting large brokerages. Continue reading →